Moderator: xrac
Life insurers are "pushing back" against what they believe to be inappropriate settlement cases, a panelist said here at the Life Insurance Conference.
Some carriers, for instance, are filing lawsuits against originators of such cases, said panelist Maggie Mitchell, vice president-advanced markets in the Denver office of ING, a unit of ING Groep N.V., Amsterdam.
Typically, these lawsuits charge misrepresentation or failure to prove insurable interest, she said at the meeting, which was co-sponsored by LIMRA International, Windsor, Conn.; LOMA, Atlanta; Society of Actuaries, Schaumberg, Ill.; and the American Council of Life Insurers, Washington.
"We've also terminated agents for cause--if all of the agent's business is settled, for instance,” Mitchell said. “We've also turned some agents over to the licensing authorities."
MattGRosenthal wrote:I must say that I agree with the statemnet that, "Insurers depend on lapses". If I had the money I would love to purchase policies on everyone!
I personally come from a large family, and have an aunt Mary (my mom's aunt) who "made a living" on life insurance. When her mother died in the 70's she received $150,000 in Life Insurance. She took a big part of that money and used it to buy policies on almost every family member she had (in fact she has one on me for $50,000). Now granted in return, she does pay for ALL of the funerals that she has a policy on the person for, but she hasn't worked as long as I've known her. Basically, I guarantee you we attend at least 2 funerals a year that she has policies on the family member.
Simply put, it just makes sense! I'm sure that every one here has attended at least 2 funerals a year, and if you made 50 to 100 thousand for everyone you attended, you would still make a living after you paid all of the premiums.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest